I then captured a collection of the houses in my area of study that complied with these outcomes. I noticed tension with the conclusions and observations of my study versus what society believes makes a healthy urban community. For example, I concluded that that houses that are thriving in these neighborhoods are the ones with smaller to no porches while sociological studies show that porches are a great connection for person to person contact as well as connecting with nature. My studies also concluded that the properties with more private space promotes all aspects of health, whether physical, mental, or social. On the other hand, I did see some overlap between my conclusions and sociological research. For example, my conclusion stated that a house becomes more valuable as the setback increases, increasing the amount of front yard, which runs parallel with sociological studies that show people have a higher well-being and lower mental distress when living around greater amounts of green space, and the physical accessibility of a front yard directly realted to created a sense of community. Another instance where I saw overlap was as the location of the house gets closer to the ends of the streets the value increases, being the most valuable at the corners. Sociological research proves that homes in the center of the block are more likely to be broken into while homes on the corners provide for more visibility of the street. All of these instances serve as base of my design response.